AQF finally recognises one year Law Masters degrees

There has been a long struggle for Law Schools over compliance with the Australian Quality Framework which has till now required Masters degrees  to be typically 2 years in length (unless students already held an Honours  or Graduate Diploma qualification).

An email from the AQF today announces that the wording of the Masters specification has been changed.  The FAQ attached says:

Question: What are the changes to the Masters Degree specification?

Answer: The revised Masters Degree Specification is included in the Addendum to the AQF Second Edition January 2013: Amended Qualification Type: Masters Degree. This Addendum replaces pages 59-62 of the AQF Second Edition.

Change 1

The volume of learning descriptors for the Masters Degree (Research) and the Masters Degree (Coursework) have been simplified by deleting the former complex prescriptions. The volume of learning descriptors now comprise a single sentence:

Volume of learning The volume of learning of a Masters Degree (Research) is typically 1 – 2 years. The volume of learning of a Masters Degree (Coursework) is typically 1 – 2 years. The volume of learning of a Masters Degree (Extended) is typically 3 – 4 years following completion of a minimum of a 3 year level 7 qualification

Change 2 Continue reading “AQF finally recognises one year Law Masters degrees”

Advertisements

Some thought candy from Zach Weiner/Weinersmith

The silly season is either upon us or about to start (end of semester, exams, marking, etc).  So, why not some thought candy?  My favorite political, philosophical, economic and science commentator, Zach Weiner (illustrator and author of Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal) has self published what looks to be a very interesting thought experiment, “Polystate: A Thought Experiment in Distributed Government.” Described thus:

“What if governments didn’t rule locations, but instead ruled minds? That is the question explored in this eBook.  “Polystate” refers to the idea of a geographic entity in which multiple overlapping states exist, each consisting of citizens who have agreed to the laws of a single non-geographic state. In this sense, the book is a discussion not of a particular form of government, but a meta-government in which each person is free to choose a new constitution on a yearly basis without the encumbrance of relocation.  It is not clear whether such an institution as a Polystate is possible or desirable, but the author sets out to discuss ways in which it might conceivably work, and why it might be desirable.”

Looks very entertaining, though I am sure the experts among you will be able to point to similar ideas in the works of some of the great philosophers and thinkers of the past. My suspicion is there are few new ideas in the world, just new forms of packaging.  But the packaging looks particularly appealing in this case.  I look forward to reading it during breaks from marking/grading.

Colin Picker

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑